Friday, February 25, 2011

Headline News

I'm staying home today, mostly to pray & catch up on assigned reading for my Metaphysics class - mostly Aristotle. While another cup of coffee was brewing, I switched on the TV just in time to hear the CNN announcetrix relay matter-of-factly that the Pro Life billboard in NY calling out Planned Parenthood is being removed for "reasons of safety," whilst showing a video clip of the sign coming down.

Without a word of comment, the newswoman then moved on the next story, beginning with such an expression of angst, "This next story is soooo sad! A group of baby bottle-nosed dolphins has been found washed up on shore..."

Folks, I ain't against dolphins by any means, but I hope you can see the tragedy knotted up in this 30-second piece of reporting.

Saturday, February 19, 2011

Confucius says...

The Master said, "The gentlemen helps others to effect what is good; he does not help them to effect what is bad. The small man does the opposite." - Book 12, verse 16
...
. . .

Zi-zhang asked, "What must a Gentleman be like before he can be said to have got through?"

The Master said, "What on earth do you mean by getting through?"

Zi-zhang answered, "What I have in mind is a man who is sure to be known whether he serves in a state or in a noble family."

The Master said, "That is being known, not getting through. Now the term 'getting through' describes a man who is straight by nature and fond of what is right, sensitive to other people's words and observant of the expression on their faces, and always mindful of being modest. Such a man is bound to get through whether he serves in a state or in a noble family.

"On the other hand, the term 'being known' describes a man who has no misgivings about his own claim to benevolence when all he is doing is putting up a facade of benevolence which is belied by his deeds. Such a man is sure to be known, whether he serves in a state or in a noble family." - Book 12, verse 20

Friday, February 18, 2011

As we forgive others...


My parish is holding a Scripture study on the Psalms as read through the lens of the Lord's Prayer.

In the section on "Give us our daily bread," we considered the things that we ask of God. Often that is deliverance from a difficult situation. The psalmist of Psalms 5 & 6 pleads with God for the destruction of evil-doers, those who disregard God's name.

However, in the "Forgive us our tresspasses" section, it is the psalmist of Psalm 51 himself who has commited evil against God, but now he's not so eager for God to give the evil-doers what they really deserve, is he?!? Now he wants forgiveness. To be fair, he does acknowledge that God would be perfectly just in giving him the destruction that he knows he deserves, yet he trusts in God's mercy.

This is surely why Jesus teaches us in the Our Father that God's forgiveness of us is dependent on our forgiveness of others. We continually wrong God with our sins, but we trust in his mercy so much that we rarely consider his just judgment as a real possibility. I hope that trust is not really a taking-for-granted. St. Francis de Sales noted pointedly that we sinners deserve nothing but eternal damnation. We expect God's lavish & unending mercy & forgiveness for ourselves, yet we are pretty stingy with mercy toward others - we expect them to pay dearly for whatever they've done to us.
...
There is a Latin word that sumptuously describes the love of God: misericordia. One might translate that as "heart-mercy," but it is usually just translated as love or mercy. But it reminds me that God's mercy is not in its box, his love in another box, & his forgiveness in yet another box, & so on. It is all part of God's unbounded love, which St. John tells us is his very essence.
...
If we refuse to forgive someone, then our hearts are divided & fractured. To put it plainly, we simply refuse to love. This is a very sketchy place from which to insist on God's forgiveness. Since Lent is nigh upon us, perhaps this is a good to reflect on the immensity of God's love compared to the paucity of own, both for him & for others.

With an eye towards to events in the life of David that occasioned the writing of Psalm 51, we also discussed the sources of temptation. Franciscan Father Charles has a few insightful words about this on his blog in a post titled Diabolical Temptations.

I hope you are all enjoying the unseasonably fine weather, at least here in East Tennessee. God bless.
. . .
P.S.: Above photo taken at the Nashville cathedral at the Aquinas College Theological & Catechedtical Forum on Feb 5, 2011. Click Here to hear & see the guest speakers, including D. Scott Hahn, reflect on the thinking of Pope Benedict XVI.

Saturday, January 29, 2011

On the Restoration of Sanity


Though St. Thomas' feast day was yesterday, I didn't want it to slip by without a note.

The greatness of St. Thomas lies in his applying both mind & heart to the age-old questions, Who am I? What does it mean to exist? What is the end of all things? How do we get there?

The Greek asked & tried to answer these questions, too; but Thomas did so in the light of Jesus Christ, and that makes all the difference. In this purifying of pagan thought, he re-established that things that are, really are. He affirmed that real people are more important than concepts. He fought for creation, & in doing so, fought for the Creator. He took people & the real things of life seriously. He showed that faith in God is reasonable & obtainable, even if not completely graspable. He wanted to illuminate Jesus Christ for others for the salvation of their souls, & also of his own.

Most people think Thomas is a great saint because of his prodigious intellectual work. It seems that not. I think it is because he wrote hymns. Lovers sing. The Church still sings even today the Eucharistic hymns Adoro te Devote, Panis Angelicus, & O Salutaris Hostia among others. I cannot now recall another Eucharistic hymn that even begins to hold a candle to these works. It was his great love of the God who came down to join man as man - & continues to come down to join man as food - that fueled his passion, not only to understand, but to praise.

Some might think Thomas' teachings are too other-worldly to be grasped; I would say he was simply delirious with the love of God.

Thank you, St. Thomas of Aquino, for helping to restore an island of sanity in an insane world. Please pray for us.

Nota Bene: Here is my review of G.K. Chesterton's biography of St. Thomas.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Sell What You Have & Follow Me


One Sunday morning a long time ago when I was just a bored teenager, I heard an amazing homily - one that I will never forget.

And when I get too busy, too self-absorbed, too ungrateful, too entrenched in this world, too eager to pursue its pleasures, too offended when things don't go my way, too sulky when I don't get what I want, when I get my fragile ego bruised too easily, I think of a 1 sentence homily given by a parish priest quietly burning with a righteous anger.

"Folks, it's time to put away the BMW's & Audis, & get busy with the work of God."

Thanks, Fr. Foley.

Monday, January 10, 2011

Bridesong

Gregorian Chant has entered my life & changed it. What is this strange & otherworldly music? It is the song of the Church. The cry of the Bride for the Bridegroom.

She cries, "I sought him, and found him not: I called, and he did not answer me... if you find my beloved, tell him that I languish with love."

It is important to know 2 things: firstly, that Gregorian chant arose alongside & within the Roman liturgy from its very origins - it is something integral to it, not imposed from without; & secondly, that the Church has worked steadfastly for over 100 years now to restore & re-establish chant as the primary music of the liturgy, an effort that promises to yield great fruit for the Church's liturgical life of prayer in the years to come.

Sometimes I hear that Gregorian chant is a throwback to the "bad ole days." Falderall! The Council affirmed that chant would be integral to the revised liturgy. It is never improper to sing the Propers or Ordinaries at Mass, but it may very well be improper to sing any number of the heterodox, modern hymns that have been become standard fare in many parishes today.

I've read some interesting articles & commentaries that the singing of chant is somehow "unpastoral,," that chant is difficult & so relegates the congregation to the mere spectators or shuts them out entirely. Bolderdash! Sacrosanctum Concilium relays that the priest should sing his part (the greetings, prayers, the canon, etc.), the choir should sing their part (i.e., the Propers), & the people should sing their part (i.e., the Ordinaries & responses). The people's chants are generally simple - 1 note per syllable in simple melodies & rhythms. The more complex pieces, like Offertory prayers, take a lifetime of study even for advanced choristers to get down. Chant actually puts us on equal footing, for it neither dwells in the stratosphere of the elite, nor drags us all down to the lowest possible common denominator. We're all on a journey to God; chant can help us reach toward the heavenly realm.

The divisive now/then attitude seems to have arisen from several sources: a steady diet of silent low Masses before the Council, a 60's spirit of false egalitarianism that requires that there are no differences between roles in the liturgy so that everybody must be able to do everything, & a distorted & shallow notion of what active participation means. Put positively, one should learn to cultivate a disposition of humble & expectant receptivity in the liturgy, which includes the joining of one's mind & heart with the offering of a chanted prayer. It requires a radical change of orientation of one's approach to liturgy, from doing to receiving, from busyness to stillness, from noise to silence, from being rooted in the now to participating in the eternal liturgy of heaven.

It is interesting that the recent resurgence in chant has mostly been a grass-roots effort among the laity. The Church Music Association of America offers weekend & week-long workshops in Gregorian chant several times a year. The web is absolutely abuzz with resources to make the chants as accessible as possible, especially Corpus Christi Watershed (including this great little video on what sacred music is). There is a rising tide of younger voices who want the full-expression of the Catholic liturgy as fully expressed by the recent council & every pope of the last 100 years.

The timing could not be better to reintroduce chant into the Church's repertoire with the revised English translation of the Roman Missal, as many of the afore-mentioned sites are already setting the English texts to traditional chant tones, many without any charge for their work. Wonderful in itself, this could also be a great first step to introducing a parish to genuine Gregorian chants, which really cannot be successfully translated from of the Roman Church's native tongue. It is my long-standing position that the Kyrie, Sanctus, & Agnus Dei should always & everywhere be sung in the ancient tongues anyway.

I would never argue that chant be the only music permitted in the Roman liturgy (though that wouldn't be so bad, either). However, it is the Church's native expression of prayer & should have the prominence in the liturgy for which the Council called. It is the voice of the faithful crying out to their God. It is the voice of the Bride longing for her Bridegroom.

He responds, "Show me your face, let your voice sound in my ears: for your voice is sweet, and your face comely."

. . .

N.B.: The chant at the top of the post links to a YouTube video of the 2009 chant pilgrimage to the National Shrine in D.C. Scott Turkington is leading us students through a 1st sight-reading of Ut Queant Laxis, the hymn of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist. Sight-reading! This 'choir' is a mix of beginners & experts, but note how quickly the group gels up & how strong it sounds by the end. Sight-reading! The 1st syllable of 1st word of each phrase (in bold) are the basis of the Do-Re-Mi- nomenclature (explained here - I'm the guy in the white shirt on the right!). Scott's introductory comment is a reference to the song Maria used to teach the children how to sing in The Sound of Music.

Sunday, December 26, 2010

A Thing of Beauty Is a Joy Forever


As I have shared before, the most beautiful, memorable, & life-changing Mass I recall ever attending was the votive Mass of Blessed Virgin Mary celebrated in the Extraordinary From at the chant workshop in September 2009 in the crypt church of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, D.C. Here is Fr. McAfee's homily from that Mass...

A thing of beauty is a joy forever
Its loveliness increases;
It will never pass into nothingness.
–John Keats

When the envoys of Vladimir, Prince of Kiev returned from attending the Divine Liturgy at the in Hagia Sophia Cathedral in Constantinople in the late tenth century, they gave this report; “we knew not whether we were in heaven or on earth, for surely there is no such splendor or beauty anywhere on earth. We cannot describe it to you; only this we know, that God dwells there among men, and that their service surpasses the worship of all other places. For we cannot forget the beauty!”

President John Adams, in a letter to his wife Abigail, told of a visit to a “Romish Chapel”, it said it part; “The music was consisting of an organ and a choir of singers, went all the afternoon, excepting sermon time, and the assembly chanted-most sweetly and exquisitely. Here is every thing which can lay hold of the eye, ear, and imagination. Everything which can charm and bewitch the simple and ignorant. I wonder how Luther ever broke the spell”.

St. Teresa of Avilla declared, “I am always shaken by the grandeur of the ceremonies of the Church.” The love of beauty and its expression for the work of art is not itself beauty but its expression is homage to God because, according to St. Thomas Aquinas, “beauty is one of the names of God”. Thus the church, when she is summoned to celebrate the Divine Mysteries, utilizes all of the arts appealing to the senses because the beautiful is “id quod visum placet” ‘vision of which’ when beheld is pleasing. The soberness of the chant, the splendor of the instruments, the festivity of the vestments, the pageantry of the incense, the candles, the vessels, the holy water – all of these aid us in our worship of the Triune God who created beauty, sustains beauty, redeemed beauty and is Beauty itself.

The Church has traditionally clothed the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass with mystery. Using the goods of creation, the Church in her transcendent earthiness leads her children to God and God through the same means descends to them. The Church at times has forgotten this. Pope Benedict XVI (as Cardinal Ratzinger) lamented, “Since the [Second] Vatican Council the Church has turned its back on beauty.” Just a few years ago the Pontifical council of culture in Rome issued this plea “give beauty back to ecclesiastical buildings, give beauty back to the liturgical objects!” Not only has the Church turned her back on beauty, she seems to be embarrassed by it. She who was once the patroness of the arts.

We have been impoverished. We are, to use a phrase of Paul Claudel’s, “we live in an age of starved imagination”. According to the philosopher Plotinus “the soul must climb the ladder of the beautiful before it can encounter the vision of First Beauty. But what happens when they remove the rungs of the ladder?

Scientists tell us that the left side of the brain specializes in mathematics, analysis, science and so on. It is the right side of the brain is incurably romantic its province is poetry, love, art, music. It is the right side of the brain that is called into play by a high form of Liturgy. One author has said, “During a more de-ritualized example of the vernacular Mass, the right brain, that miniature Homer or Shakespeare in all of us, is smothered to death”.

H. L. Menken who wrote for a Baltimore paper, and was no friend of religion, found himself admiring the Catholic Church as he said in 1923; “The Latin Church, which I constantly find myself admiring, despite its frequent astounding imbecilities, has always kept clearly before it the fact that religion is not a syllogism, but a poem…. Rome, indeed, has not only preserved the original poetry of Christianity; it has also made capital additions to that poetry—for example, the poetry of the saints, of Mary, of the liturgy itself.” “A solemn High Mass,” he concluded, “must be a thousand times as impressive as the most powerful sermon ever roared under the big-top… in the face of such overwhelming beauty it is not necessary to belabor the faithful with logic; they are better convinced by letting them alone.”

Listen to the enemies of the Church. They tremble at every swing of incense and each and every genuflection. In 1888 a Seventh Day Adventist published a book about the Whore of Babylon. When Judge Clarence Thomas was named to the Supreme Court the book was reissued. Here the author remarks about Catholic Worship…remember this was in the 19th century: “Many Protestants suppose that the Catholic religion is unattractive and that its worship is a dull, meaningless round of ceremony. Here they mistake. While Romanism is based upon deception, it is not a coarse and clumsy imposture. The religious service of the Roman Church is a most impressive ceremonial. Its gorgeous display and solemn rites fascinate the senses of the people and silence the voice of reason and of conscience. The eye is charmed. Magnificent churches, imposing processions, golden altars, jeweled shrines, choice paintings, and exquisite sculpture appeal to the love of beauty. The ear also is captivated. The music is unsurpassed. The rich notes of the deep-toned organ, blending with the melody of many voices as it swells through the lofty domes and pillared aisles of her grand cathedrals, cannot fail to impress the mind with awe and reverence. The pomp and ceremony of the Catholic Worship has the seductive, bewitching power by which many are deceived; and they come to look upon the Roman Church as the very gate of Heaven.”

In this way, many hearts hardened to the Church and her teachings, have been melted; as was the case of the “decadents”—Baudelaire, Verlaine, Aubrey, Oscar Wilde and others. “Beauty can then be fittingly called evangelical, evangelical beauty, via pulchritudinis, can open the pathway for the search for God and “dispose the heart and spirit to meet Christ who is the beauty of Holiness Incarnate offered by God to man for their salvation.”

According to St. Thomas Aquinas, for something to be considered beautiful it must have three qualities, integrity, harmony, clarity or radiance. When the radiance breaks through and the teachings of the Church are made manifest and the Catholic Church is recognized as the place where the truth abides and the home of beauty. This was the case with the decadents. Hans Urs von Balthasar has written that when “the good has lost its power of attraction, when proofs have lost their conclusive character; then the beautiful will empower”.

Pope Benedict XVI, in his telling of the visit of the delegates of Prince Vladimir of Kiev to Constantinople said that the delegation and the prince accepted the truth of Christianity not by the cogency of its theological augmentations but by the beauty of the mystery of its Liturgy.

The poet Baudelaire wrote; “It is at once through poetry and across poetry, through and across music, that the soul glimpses the splendor situated beyond the grave; and when an exquisite poem brings tears to the eyes these tears are not proof of excessive joy. They are the testimony of an irritated melancholy, a demand of the nerves, of a nature exiled in the imperfect, and now desiring to take possession of his world.”

Baudelaire was significantly influenced on his idea of beauty by an American writer he much admired, Edgar Allan Poe. Poe states of beauty: “We still have a thirst unquenchable, the thirst belonging to the immortality of man. He is at once a consequence and an indication of this perennial nature. It is the desire of the moth for the stars. It is no mere appreciation of the beauty before us, but veiled effort to reach the beauty above.”

Why then must the Liturgy be beautiful? Because beauty provides a vehicle to transcend our present lives and to touch the skirts of heaven. When we encounter finite beauty there is engendered a more passionate longing for absolute immortal beauty of which the earthly temporal beauty is but an ephemeral epiphany.

In the Epistle to the Hebrews, Christ is called the leiturgos, the Liturgist who presides over all our rituals, who Himself offers the Liturgy. Since Christ is the leiturgos and Christ is Beauty Incarnate, all beauty must reflect him and all beauty must flow from Him in the Liturgy.

Christ the Word Made Flesh is the greatest masterpiece. Christ is the most perfect symphony. Christ is the loveliest painting. Christ is the cosmic beat in the everlasting poem.

St. John of the Cross said; “God passes through the thickets of the world and wherever His glance falls, he turns all things to beauty”.

St. Paul wrote to Timothy; “He is King of Kings and Lord of Lords. He does possess immortality dwelling in unapproachable light”. Yet in the Divine Liturgy of the Mass we make bold to approach Him who lives in unapproachable light.

How can I describe the Liturgy? I can describe the Liturgy with one word. In the courts of heaven, amid the chorus of angels, there is but one word spoken, one solitary word which the cherubim and seraphim utter before the majesty of the cosmic liturgy of the glorified Lamb once slain but now risen, and that word is…

That simple word…

That glorious, triumphant word is…

AHHH!